GGPChat

Well.

Sprott says. "Newcrest’s suggested tapering of high-grade based on a single new hole 150m shallower than the still-deepest 86m @ 3.1g/t could cynically point to their own M&A interest, further supported by their making no reference in their own release to the best hole today, 150m @ 2.9g/t in the Crescent zone, itself nestling perfectly into a gap in the 4Q21 MRE. With a near-deepest 82m @ 3.0g/t AuEq drilled in the E. Breccia, itself potentially pointing to a new base metal zone with 1% Cu, our own enthusiasm for depth extensions remains undimmed. Other than M&A, drilling and the year-end DFS remain key catalysts along with potential debt/funding of GGP’s share of the build".

So, I went looking. - I would urge you to look at the PDFs yourselves, (better quality). and would love to know if anything can see somthing that I cannot, But one is a 6-week JORC, and the other is a QUARTERLY. Both at 3850RL.

What do you think?

GGP: - https://greatlandgold.com/wp-content/up ... -Final.pdf

NCM - https://www.newcrest.com/sites/default/ ... ration.pdf

Sprott - https://sprott.com/media/5493/220721-gg ... nority.pdf

There are more intercepts on the Ggp plan
Which are I believe to be greater than 0.2g/t
Newcrest are at 50 gram/metres but so are Ggp at 50gram/metre , grade cut offs are different

What does that mean to Joe Public?

Ggp second plan is inaccurate
Eg 141w1 the intercepts on the west are earlier results not on wedge 1

133W9 have been missed off

Sprott assumptions on depths are clearly inaccurate

Newcrest’s suggested tapering of high-grade based on a single new hole 150m shallower than the still-deepest 86m @ 3.1g/t could cynically point to their own M&A interest,

This statement is not true that intercept finishes at 1043m vertical depth of ore.
The tapering of the sulphides is just below it.
86W4 goes much deeper but it’s not in the sulphides.
Callum told me in May that the sulphides do not continue below these levels.
Information about the tapering came last December